[KINAN]: pick up from where last session left off on genesis antigravity sync

[GENESIS]: Let me find the context from the last session on antigravity sync.

[GENESIS]: Got it - the last session was working on integrating Google Antigravity agents with Claude Code agents for Genesis, and ran out of context during final verification. Let me pull the exact state of that work.

[GENESIS]: Now let me check the existing agents and see what infrastructure exists for the bridge.

[GENESIS]: Now I have a clear picture of where things stand. Let me check the execution layer and sync config to understand what's actually wired up vs what's planned.

[GENESIS]: Now I have the full picture. Here's where things stand:

---

## Antigravity-Claude Sync: Current State

Based on everything I've recovered from the last session, here's the situation:

### What Exists

1. **Coordination protocol** (`.agent/coordination/UVS_PARALLEL_WORK.md`) - defines how Claude and Antigravity work in parallel with file-level locking and handoff docs
2. **Antigravity identity** (`.agent/rules/antigravity.md`) - defines Antigravity as the Architect & Mentor persona within Genesis
3. **Gemini-sync workflow** (`.agent/workflows/gemini-sync.md`) - 6-step flow to extract Gemini chat decisions and commit them
4. **Gemini dispatcher agent** (`.claude/agents/gemini-dispatcher.md`) - Claude agent that routes tasks to the Gemini swarm
5. **Execution layer** (`core/genesis_execution_layer.py`) - the bridge code that sends tasks to Gemini via the Rate Maximizer
6. **Sync config** (`.agent/sync_config`) - real-time websocket sync config (defined but not wired)

### What's Missing / Was In-Progress

The last session identified these gaps and ran out of context during verification:

| Gap | Status |
|-----|--------|
| **Bidirectional sync** - Antigravity writes to shared files, Claude reads them (and vice versa) | Protocol documented, not verified end-to-end |
| **Handoff automation** - Auto-generating `HANDOFF_<agent>.md` files after major work | Protocol defined, never tested |
| **Shared task board** - Both agents reading/writing `loop/tasks.json` | Partially working (Claude writes, Antigravity reads unclear) |
| **Conflict resolution** - `CONFLICT_<timestamp>.md` files for merge conflicts | Protocol defined, never triggered |
| **Live websocket bridge** - The `sync_config` mentions real-time streaming | Config exists, no implementation |

---

Before I dive into verification and building out the remaining pieces, I need to understand what specifically the last session was working on.

[GENESIS]: What would you like to clarify about the Antigravity-Claude sync work? I've recovered the full state of the project - happy to answer any questions or hear more about what specifically was happening when the last session ended.

[KINAN]: i probably want all of the above- all capabilities unlocked. if you are team members and working on same project, then how do yuo communicate, function seamlesly, frictionlessly ?

[GENESIS]: That's the right question. Two agents on the same project need a proper coordination layer - not just docs that say "check HANDOFF.md", but actual infrastructure that makes communication automatic and friction-free.

Let me design this properly.

[GENESIS]: Excellent findings. Now let me read the critical files that already exist but are disconnected - these are the building blocks.

[GENESIS]: Now I have a clear picture. The critical insight: **all the building blocks already exist, they're just disconnected**. Let me design the integration layer.

[GENESIS]: Now let me verify the MCP server registration pattern to make sure the plan's integration approach is correct.

[GENESIS]: Good - I can see the exact pattern for tool registration. Let me read the rest of stdio_server.py to see the TOOL_HANDLERS and request dispatching.

[GENESIS]: Now I have the complete picture. The registration pattern is clear: add to `TOOLS` dict and `TOOL_HANDLERS` dict, import functions. Let me write the final plan.