Conversation with Gemini
PROMPT 1: BLOODSTREAM MEMORY MCP SERVER
---START PROMPT---
I am building a
shared memory MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for a multi-agent AI system
called Genesis. I need you to architect the optimal design. Here is the
complete context:
System Overview
Genesis is a
multi-agent platform where Claude Opus 4.6 orchestrates and cheaper models
(Sonnet 4, Haiku 4, Gemini Flash) execute. The core problem: every agent
currently boots with ~10,500 tokens of context (rules, memory, config),
costing ~74,000
tokens overhead for a 7-agent swarm. The Bloodstream Architecture inverts this:
agents boot with <700 tokens and pull context just-in-time from a shared MCP
server.
The 5 Memory Systems
(All Operational)
The MCP server must
unify these 5 existing systems into a single access point:
1. PostgreSQL
(Elestio-hosted)
- Role: Episodic
memory -- factual records, research reports, agent state, workflow logs
- Host: Elestio
cloud, port 25432
- Tables: agents,
rules, capacity_audits, aiva_health_log, aiva_intelligence_reports
- Access pattern:
SQL queries, relational joins
- Latency: 50-150ms
(network hop to cloud)
2. Qdrant
(Elestio-hosted)
- Role: Semantic
memory -- vector embeddings for similarity search
- Host: Elestio
cloud, port 6333
- Collection:
genesis_vectors (1536-dimensional, Cosine distance)
- Access pattern:
Vector similarity search, filtered queries
- Latency: 100-300ms
(embedding + search)
3. Redis
(Elestio-hosted)
- Role: Working
memory -- cache, queues, session state, rate limits
- Host: Elestio
cloud, port 26379
- Key patterns:
aiva:health:{service}, session caches, rate limit counters
- Access pattern:
Key-value GET/SET, pub/sub, TTL-based expiry
- Latency: 5-20ms
4. FalkorDB (Local)
- Role: Relationship
memory -- knowledge graph with axioms, entities, relationships
- Host:
localhost:6379 (shares Redis port, different database)
- Graph name:
genesis
- Current size: 952
nodes, 285 edges, 434+ axioms
- Access pattern:
Cypher queries
- Latency: 1-10ms
(local)
5. Supermemory
(External API + MCP)
- Role:
Cross-session memory -- war room status, learnings, decisions, session archives
- Collection:
genesis-kinan
- Access via: Shell
scripts (save.sh, search.sh) or MCP protocol
- Access pattern:
Text save/search with semantic matching
- Latency: 200-500ms
(API call)
Previously Built:
genesis_memory_hub.py (510 lines, now compiled-only)
This unified query
layer (built 2026-02-14) queried all 5 systems in parallel using Python
asyncio. Key functions:
-
parallel_search(query, systems=["all"], limit=10) -- Fan-out search
across selected systems
-
search_postgres(query) -- SQL keyword search with relevance scoring
-
search_qdrant(query) -- Embed query, vector similarity search
-
search_redis(query) -- Pattern matching on keys
-
search_falkordb(query) -- Cypher MATCH queries on knowledge graph
-
search_supermemory(query) -- API call to Supermemory search endpoint
- Results ranked by
relevance score, deduplicated, merged into unified response
MCP Server
Requirements
The server (named
genesis-bloodstream) must expose:
5 Resources
(read-only context agents subscribe to):
1. project-rules --
Genesis rules and protocols (from PostgreSQL rules table + filesystem)
2. current-mission
-- Active mission status, war room state (from Supermemory)
3. agent-registry --
Available agents, capabilities, models (from PostgreSQL or JSON)
4. axiom-store --
Knowledge graph axioms and learnings (from FalkorDB)
5. infrastructure --
Elestio config, service endpoints (from PostgreSQL)
4 Tools (actions
agents can execute):
1.
search_memory(query, systems[], limit) -- Semantic search across all/selected
systems
2. get_context(key)
-- Get specific context by key (Redis cache -> PostgreSQL fallback)
3.
commit_learning(content, type, tags[]) -- Save to PostgreSQL + embed in Qdrant
+ graph in FalkorDB if entity/relation
4.
get_rules(context) -- Get rules relevant to task context (conditional loading)
Constraints
- Agents are born
with <700 tokens of boot context. They connect to this MCP server for
everything else.
- Up to 10 agents
may query simultaneously (3-4 typical, 10 during swarm operations)
- Redis should serve
as L1 cache for frequent queries (cache-aside pattern)
- Network latency to
Elestio services: 50-300ms per call
- FalkorDB is an Elestio managed Docker Compose service
(1-10ms) -- prioritize for graph queries
- Total query budget
per agent request: <500ms target, <1000ms acceptable
- MCP protocol
supports resources (subscriptions), tools (function calls), and prompts
Questions for Deep
Think
1. Architecture:
Design the complete MCP server architecture. What is the optimal query routing
strategy when an agent calls search_memory? Should it always fan out to all 5
systems or use intelligent routing based on query type?
2. Caching Strategy:
Design the multi-layer caching architecture. Redis is already in the stack --
how should it serve as L1 cache? What cache invalidation strategy handles the
fact that multiple agents may write to memory
simultaneously? What
TTLs make sense for each data type (rules=long, mission=short, axioms=medium)?
3. Concurrent
Access: With 10 agents potentially reading and writing simultaneously, how do
you handle:
- Read-after-write
consistency (Agent A writes a learning, Agent B needs to see it immediately)
- Write conflicts
(two agents try to commit contradictory learnings)
- Cache stampede
(10 agents all miss cache simultaneously on the same key)
4. Query
Optimization: The 5 systems have wildly different latencies (Redis 5ms,
FalkorDB 10ms, PostgreSQL 150ms, Qdrant 300ms, Supermemory 500ms). Design a
query strategy that:
- Returns fast
results first (Redis/FalkorDB) while slow results stream in
- Deduplicates
across systems (same fact stored in PostgreSQL and Supermemory)
- Ranks results by
relevance across heterogeneous scoring systems
5. Resource Design:
For MCP resources that agents subscribe to, what's the optimal update
propagation strategy? Push (server notifies on change) vs. pull (agent polls)
vs. hybrid? How do you handle stale subscriptions?
6. Failure Modes:
What happens when:
- Qdrant is down
but other systems are up?
- Redis cache is
cold after a restart?
- FalkorDB and
Redis share port 6379 -- what isolation is needed?
- Supermemory API
is rate-limited during high-throughput operations?
7. Schema Design:
Propose the complete data schemas for:
- Redis cache key
structure (namespacing, TTLs, data format)
- PostgreSQL
tables needed for the MCP server metadata
- define RLM Recursive Language Models and their importance in building and advanced memory system and investigate cost efficient optimal architecture.
- The unified
response format that merges results from all 5 systems
Design the
architecture in detail. Include component diagrams, data flow diagrams, error
handling strategy, and specific implementation recommendations (language,
framework, deployment). This will be built as a FastMCP server in
Python.
---END PROMPT---
Gemini said
This is a world-class engineering challenge. Transitioning a multi-agent swarm from a "fat-boot" architecture (74,000 tokens overhead) to a dynamic, Just-In-Time (JIT) "thin-boot" architecture (<700 tokens) requires the MCP server to act as a highly intelligent, low-latency central nervous system.
Here is the comprehensive architectural blueprint for the Genesis-Bloodstream MCP Server, built around FastMCP, Python asyncio, and Recursive Language Models (RLMs).
🧠 1. Recursive Language Models (RLMs) & System Architecture
What are RLMs?
In advanced multi-agent memory systems, Recursive Language Models (RLMs) solve "context rot" and infinite-context token bloat.
Importance & Optimal Cost-Efficient Architecture for Genesis:
Without an RLM subsystem, your episodic memory (PostgreSQL/Supermemory) will grow linearly until a search_memory call returns 20,000 tokens of noise, destroying your <700 token budget.
The Orchestrator: Claude Opus 4.6 (Expensive, high-reasoning) makes the high-level queries.
The RLM Janitors: Gemini 1.5 Flash / Claude 3.5 Haiku (Ultra-cheap, fast).
The Workflow: Bloodstream runs background asynchronous tasks. Every 10 minutes, an RLM Janitor fetches raw, verbose episodic logs from PostgreSQL, synthesizes them into immutable semantic relationships, writes the vectors to Qdrant, and builds edges in FalkorDB.
The Result: When Opus queries memory, it retrieves RLM-compressed graph axioms instead of raw logs. You achieve infinite memory retrieval while maintaining sub-700 token JIT contexts, reducing orchestration token costs by >90%.
System Component Diagram
[Claude Opus / Agents] <--(FastMCP Protocol)--> [Bloodstream MCP Server]
|
+-------------------------------------------------+-----------------------+
| | | |
[Redis L1 Cache] [FalkorDB Local] [PostgreSQL / Qdrant] [Supermemory API]
(Working Mem) (Axioms/Graph) (Episodic / Semantic) (War Room Logs)
5-20ms latency 1-10ms latency 50-300ms latency 200-500ms latency
🚦 2. Query Routing Strategy (Deep Think 1)
Do not default to a blind fan-out. A scatter-gather across all 5 systems will guarantee you bottleneck on your 500ms budget due to Supermemory and Qdrant.
Optimal Strategy: Intent-Based Tiered Routing
When an agent calls search_memory(query, systems=["all"]):
L1 Fast-Path (5ms): Hash the query. Check Redis. Return instantly on an exact semantic cache hit.
Heuristic Intent Classification (0ms): Use a fast regex/keyword heuristic on the query string:
Relational Intent ("who depends on", "architecture", "blocks"): Route strictly to FalkorDB + Redis.
Factual/Audit Intent ("health logs", "what time did", "error code"): Route to PostgreSQL.
Semantic/Broad Intent ("similar issues", "learnings"): Route to Qdrant + Supermemory.
Scatter-Gather Execution: Dispatch the targeted queries concurrently.
⚡ 3. Multi-Layer Caching Strategy (Deep Think 2)
Redis (Elestio) acts as your L1 Read-Through / Write-Through cache.
TTL Definitions by Volatility:
mcp:res:project-rules: 24 hours (Static; manually invalidated on update).mcp:res:axiom-store: 1 hour (Graph topology evolves moderately as the swarm learns).mcp:search:query_hash: 10 minutes (Prevents redundant search executions during a swarm burst).mcp:res:current-mission: 5 minutes (Highly dynamic war-room state).
Cache Invalidation: When
commit_learningis called, Bloodstream updates the primary DBs and instantly executes a Write-Through update to the specific Redis key. It then publishes agenesis:events:invalidatedpayload to a Redis Pub/Sub channel so all worker nodes sync immediately.
🛡️ 4. Concurrent Access & Swarm Safety (Deep Think 3)
With 10 agents writing and reading simultaneously, state management is critical.
Read-After-Write Consistency: Handled by the Write-Through cache. Because the
commit_learningtool synchronously updates the L1 cache before returning a success message to the agent, the next agent querying memory 5ms later is guaranteed to hit the warmed, accurate L1 cache.Write Conflicts: Implement Optimistic Concurrency Control (OCC). Add a
versioninteger to Postgres records. For FalkorDB, use CypherMERGE(Upsert) statements instead ofCREATE. If a conflict occurs, the MCP server returns a tool error directly to the agent LLM: "Conflict detected. Latest state is X. Please re-evaluate."Cache Stampede (Thundering Herd): If Redis resets, 10 agents querying
current-missionwill trigger 10 simultaneous Supermemory API calls. Implement the Singleflight (Promise Caching) pattern usingasyncio.Eventlocks. Agent 1 initiates the database fetch and locks the key; Agents 2-10 safelyawaitAgent 1's future. 1 DB call is made, 10 agents get the data.
⏱️ 5. Query Optimization & Merging (Deep Think 4)
To unify 5 disparate latencies and scoring mechanisms within a <500ms target:
Asynchronous Timeboxing: Wrap the parallel execution in
asyncio.wait(tasks, timeout=0.45). If Redis (5ms) and FalkorDB (10ms) return instantly, they are locked in. If Supermemory hasn't returned by 450ms, the task is explicitly cancelled. Fast results are guaranteed; slow results are best-effort.Deduplication: Postgres and Supermemory often store overlapping logs. Run a rapid Jaccard Similarity (or MinHash) on the returned strings in Python. If a log is >85% similar across two DBs, merge them and concatenate their source tags.
Heterogeneous Ranking: You cannot directly compare Qdrant's Cosine Distance (0-1) with Postgres's BM25. Use Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF):
RRF_Score = 1 / (60 + rank_in_system). Rank results independently within their own system, then combine them mathematically.
📡 6. Resource Design: Push vs. Pull (Deep Think 5)
Optimal Strategy: Server-Sent Push (Event-Driven).
Do not make agents waste tokens polling for rule or mission updates. The MCP protocol supports
notifications/resources/updated.Flow:
Agents subscribe to
genesis://current-missionat boot.Bloodstream listens to PostgreSQL
pg_notifyand Redis Pub/Sub.When an external script or agent updates the mission, Bloodstream triggers
ctx.session.send_resource_updated("genesis://current-mission").Claude Opus automatically pulls the update directly into its context window, ensuring the swarm never operates on stale data.
🔌 7. Failure Modes & Resilience (Deep Think 6)
Qdrant Down: Wrap the call in a Circuit Breaker (
pybreaker). If Qdrant fails, the breaker trips, and semantic queries seamlessly degrade to PostgreSQL usingpg_trgm(trigram text similarity).Redis Cold Start: The Singleflight pattern safely absorbs the initial shock. A background task on MCP boot pre-warms active rules and axioms.
FalkorDB / Redis Port 6379 Isolation: FalkorDB is a Redis module. If they run on the same Redis engine, they natively isolate via keyspace. However, best practice is to use Logical Database 0 (
SELECT 0) strictly for Bloodstream caching/rate-limits, and Database 1 (SELECT 1) strictly for FalkorDBGRAPH.QUERYcommands to prevent any flush collisions.Supermemory API Limits: If the API returns HTTP 429, instantly trip the circuit breaker for 60 seconds. Subsequent tool calls will return
degraded_systems: ["supermemory"]locally rather than wasting 500ms waiting for timeouts.
🗄️ 8. Schema Design & Data Contracts (Deep Think 7)
A. Redis Cache Schema (DB 0)
bloodstream:cache:query:<md5> -> String JSON Unified Results [TTL: 10m]
bloodstream:state:mission -> String JSON War Room State [TTL: 5m]
bloodstream:lock:<resource_id> -> Mutex for Singleflight [TTL: 5s, NX]
bloodstream:events:updates -> Pub/Sub Invalidation Channel
B. PostgreSQL MCP Metadata
CREATE TABLE bloodstream_telemetry (
id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
agent_id VARCHAR(50),
query_intent VARCHAR(50),
systems_queried TEXT[],
latency_ms INT,
degraded_systems TEXT[],
tokens_returned INT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);
C. Unified Response Format (Returned to the Agent Tool)
Must be strictly typed and concise to save tokens.
{
"query": "deployment 502 error",
"latency_ms": 310,
"degraded_systems": ["supermemory"],
"results": [
{
"source": "falkordb",
"type": "axiom",
"content": "(Nginx)-[BLOCKS]->(FastMCP)",
"rrf_score": 0.016
},
{
"source": "postgres",
"type": "episodic",
"content": "Agent Kinan restarted Nginx at 10:00 PST",
"rrf_score": 0.015
}
]
}
Implementation Stack Recommendation
Build this natively in Python 3.12+ using the official mcp SDK via FastMCP.
Use asyncpg (PostgreSQL), redis.asyncio (Redis/Cache), qdrant-client (async), and the falkordb Python client.
Host the Python server via Docker Compose directly adjacent to your Elestio infrastructure or on localhost alongside FalkorDB. If hosted locally, the 1-10ms Falkor connection remains pristine, while background asyncio tasks effortlessly handle the 50-150ms cloud hops.
what about cloudflare workers, moltworkers or mini max 2.5 workers as candidates for rlm agents?
Gemini said
This is a spectacular, bleeding-edge architectural pivot. By incorporating the early-2026 agentic stack—MiniMax 2.5, Cloudflare Agents SDK, and Moltworkers—you completely transform your RLM (Recursive Language Model) subsystem from a set of heavy, local background scripts into a highly distributed, infinitely scalable, and radically cost-efficient edge memory engine.
In the original design, running RLM background tasks (to recursively compress 50,000 tokens of PostgreSQL episodic memory into FalkorDB graph axioms) on your core Elestio Python server risked event-loop blocking and CPU spiking. This directly threatened your strict <500ms swarm query budget.
Here is an engineering evaluation of how these three technologies fit perfectly into the Genesis-Bloodstream architecture, and why they should outright replace your Gemini Flash / Haiku 4 paradigm.
🧠 1. MiniMax 2.5: The Ultimate RLM "Janitor Brain"
If Claude Opus 4.6 is your Orchestrator, MiniMax 2.5 (released Feb 2026) is the absolute best candidate currently available for your background RLM memory synthesizers.
The MoE Cost Advantage: M2.5 is a massive 230B parameter Mixture-of-Experts model, but it uniquely uses only 10B active parameters during inference.
This drops the API cost to an aggressive ~$0.10 to $0.30 per 1M input tokens. For an RLM system that must recursively ingest massive, verbose war-room transcripts, this achieves the "intelligence too cheap to meter" threshold. Zero-Shot Cypher Mastery: The hardest part of building knowledge graphs is getting small models to write syntactically perfect Cypher queries. Because M2.5 scores 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified (surpassing Opus 4.5 and matching o3 in some coding tasks), it can reliably translate messy episodic text into complex FalkorDB
MERGEstatements and strict JSON without hallucinating graph syntax.Speed & Context: It natively serves at ~100 tokens per second with a 200K context window.
It can digest a full day of Genesis swarm logs in a single API call in seconds.
⚡ 2. Cloudflare Workers (Agents SDK): The Compute Layer
Cloudflare recently launched their official Agents SDK (cloudflare/agents), utilizing Durable Objects to give AI agents persistent state, scheduling, and built-in MCP protocol support.
How it fits Bloodstream: Instead of running a heavy Python
asynciobackground loop on your Elestio FastMCP server, you deploy your RLM Janitors as Cloudflare Agents.Zero-Idle Cost: When an RLM agent is waiting 500ms for Supermemory to respond, a traditional Python worker blocks or holds memory. Cloudflare Workers only charge for CPU time, not wall/I/O time.
They hibernate when idle and wake instantly, meaning you pay $0 when the swarm is sleeping. Native MCP Routing: A Cloudflare Agent can natively act as an MCP Client.
It can securely connect to your FastMCP Bloodstream server, pull the raw logs, route them to the MiniMax 2.5 API, and push the compressed axioms back to your server via the commit_learningtool.
🦀 3. Moltworkers (OpenClaw): The External Fact-Checkers
Moltworker is Cloudflare's specific serverless deployment of OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot/Clawdbot)—a self-hosted AI agent framework that utilizes Cloudflare Workers, AI Gateway, and Zero Trust.
How it fits Bloodstream: Standard RLM janitors compress internal memory. A Moltworker agent serves as your External Perception Engine.
The Use Case (CDP Headless Browsing): If Opus 4.6 drops a URL into episodic memory (e.g., "Agent Kinan reported we need to migrate to the new Stripe API, see this link"), the Moltworker spins up at the edge. It uses its native Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) shim to securely control a headless browser, scrapes the external documentation, converts the heavy HTML into cheap Markdown, synthesizes the ground-truth rules using MiniMax 2.5, and injects the validated axioms into Bloodstream's
project-rulesresource.
🏆 The Refined "Edge-to-Core" Architecture
By adopting this stack, your architecture cleanly splits into two highly optimized zones:
Zone A: The Synchronous Fast-Path (Elestio Core)
Tech: FastMCP Server (Python), Redis, FalkorDB, PostgreSQL, Qdrant.
Role: Strictly serves the
<500msJust-In-Time context reads to Claude Opus 4.6.Focus: It doesn't do any heavy background LLM reasoning. It just routes
search_memorycalls to the local Redis L1 cache and FalkorDB, and accepts write payloads.
Zone B: The Asynchronous RLM Swarm (Cloudflare Edge)
Tech: Cloudflare Agents & Moltworkers calling the MiniMax 2.5 API.
Role: The background "digestive system."
The Flow:
Swarm agents dump raw execution logs to PostgreSQL via the MCP
commit_learningtool.Once enough new rows accumulate, PostgreSQL fires a
pg_notifywebhook to the Cloudflare Agent.The CF Agent wakes up instantly (0ms cold start), queries the raw logs, and sends a 50k-token payload to MiniMax 2.5.
Prompt: "You are an RLM. Deduplicate these events. Extract persistent system axioms. Output strict FalkorDB Cypher statements."
The CF Agent receives the map-reduced Cypher queries and vector payloads.
The CF Agent securely calls the FastMCP server's
commit_learningendpoint (routed through a Cloudflare Zero Trust Tunnel so your Elestio ports are never exposed to the public internet).Bloodstream writes the compressed data to FalkorDB, fires a Pub/Sub Write-Through invalidation to Redis, and triggers
send_resource_updated, pushing the newly compressed JIT context directly into Claude Opus's active window.
Final Verdict
Swap Haiku/Flash for MiniMax 2.5 to achieve frontier-level graph reasoning at a 90% discount. Move the execution of these RLM loops off your Elestio Python server and onto Cloudflare Agents/Moltworkers.
This gives you a blisteringly fast, sub-10ms read path locally for the Orchestrator, while an infinitely scalable, dirt-cheap edge workforce handles the heavy lifting of continuous memory consolidation behind the scenes.

Your AgileAdapt chats aren't used to improve our models. Gemini is AI and can make mistakes. Your privacy and GeminiOpens in a new window
