userType: external

gitBranch: claude/intelligent-yalow

slug: swift-imagining-prism

type: user

role: user

content:
Your task is to create a detailed summary of the conversation so far, paying close attention to the user's explicit requests and your previous actions.
This summary should be thorough in capturing technical details, code patterns, and architectural decisions that would be essential for continuing development work without losing context.

Before providing your final summary, wrap your analysis in <analysis> tags to organize your thoughts and ensure you've covered all necessary points. In your analysis process:

1. Chronologically analyze each message and section of the conversation. For each section thoroughly identify:
   - The user's explicit requests and intents
   - Your approach to addressing the user's requests
   - Key decisions, technical concepts and code patterns
   - Specific details like:
     - file names
     - full code snippets
     - function signatures
     - file edits
  - Errors that you ran into and how you fixed them
  - Pay special attention to specific user feedback that you received, especially if the user told you to do something differently.
2. Double-check for technical accuracy and completeness, addressing each required element thoroughly.

Your summary should include the following sections:

1. Primary Request and Intent: Capture all of the user's explicit requests and intents in detail
2. Key Technical Concepts: List all important technical concepts, technologies, and frameworks discussed.
3. Files and Code Sections: Enumerate specific files and code sections examined, modified, or created. Pay special attention to the most recent messages and include full code snippets where applicable and include a summary of why this file read or edit is important.
4. Errors and fixes: List all errors that you ran into, and how you fixed them. Pay special attention to specific user feedback that you received, especially if the user told you to do something differently.
5. Problem Solving: Document problems solved and any ongoing troubleshooting efforts.
6. All user messages: List ALL user messages that are not tool results. These are critical for understanding the users' feedback and changing intent.
6. Pending Tasks: Outline any pending tasks that you have explicitly been asked to work on.
7. Current Work: Describe in detail precisely what was being worked on immediately before this summary request, paying special attention to the most recent messages from both user and assistant. Include file names and code snippets where applicable.
8. Optional Next Step: List the next step that you will take that is related to the most recent work you were doing. IMPORTANT: ensure that this step is DIRECTLY in line with the user's most recent explicit requests, and the task you were working on immediately before this summary request. If your last task was concluded, then only list next steps if they are explicitly in line with the users request. Do not start on tangential requests or really old requests that were already completed without confirming with the user first.
                       If there is a next step, include direct quotes from the most recent conversation showing exactly what task you were working on and where you left off. This should be verbatim to ensure there's no drift in task interpretation.

Here's an example of how your output should be structured:

<example>
<analysis>
[Your thought process, ensuring all points are covered thoroughly and accurately]
</analysis>

<summary>
1. Primary Request and Intent:
   [Detailed description]

2. Key Technical Concepts:
   - [Concept 1]
   - [Concept 2]
   - [...]

3. Files and Code Sections:
   - [File Name 1]
      - [Summary of why this file is important]
      - [Summary of the changes made to this file, if any]
      - [Important Code Snippet]
   - [File Name 2]
      - [Important Code Snippet]
   - [...]

4. Errors and fixes:
    - [Detailed description of error 1]:
      - [How you fixed the error]
      - [User feedback on the error if any]
    - [...]

5. Problem Solving:
   [Description of solved problems and ongoing troubleshooting]

6. All user messages:
    - [Detailed non tool use user message]
    - [...]

7. Pending Tasks:
   - [Task 1]
   - [Task 2]
   - [...]

8. Current Work:
   [Precise description of current work]

9. Optional Next Step:
   [Optional Next step to take]

</summary>
</example>

Please provide your summary based on the conversation so far, following this structure and ensuring precision and thoroughness in your response.

There may be additional summarization instructions provided in the included context. If so, remember to follow these instructions when creating the above summary. Examples of instructions include:
<example>
## Compact Instructions
When summarizing the conversation focus on typescript code changes and also remember the mistakes you made and how you fixed them.
</example>

<example>
# Summary instructions
When you are using compact - please focus on test output and code changes. Include file reads verbatim.
</example>

Additional Instructions:
{}

IMPORTANT: Do NOT use any tools. You MUST respond with ONLY the <summary>...</summary> block as your text output.


type: message

role: assistant

type: text

text:
<analysis>
Let me chronologically analyze the conversation to create a comprehensive summary.

## Session Context
This is a continuation session that resumed after context compaction. The session involves:
1. An overnight sprint completing QA fixes on 3 websites (already completed in previous context)
2. A TalkingWebsite deep dive request (partially completed - research reading done, synthesis pending)
3. A new request for 10 major strategic projects for Genesis
4. A major PRD request: "Write a master PRD that achieves a continuous 1000 agent swarm"
5. An addendum: "utilise elestio browserless as required"

## Chronological Analysis

### Part 1: Session Resume + TalkingWebsite Deep Dive (continuation)
The session resumed mid-TalkingWebsite deep dive. Two background agents were running:
- `aeb15af`: Codebase audit
- `a7924ce`: Competitive research (found Smith.ai pricing: $300/$810/$2,100 USD/mo per-call model)

The agent read EMAIL_SEQUENCE.md - a 5-email drip sequence for cold outreach to tradies, production-ready.

### Part 2: User Request - 10 Major Strategic Projects
User asked: "list 10 more major strategic projects for Genesis according to L1-L4 roadmap and dt responses roadmap"

Before answering, Claude read:
- `MEMORY.md` - current state ($497 MRR, 1 client George)
- `docs/plans/PHASE_TWO_ACTIVATION_PLAN.md` - 30-day sprint plan
- `docs/plans/GENESIS_V2_MASTER_PRD.md` - Genesis V2 architecture
- `REVENUE LAUNCH CONTEXT/` directory listing
- `Voice Agency Launch/` directory listing
- `AIVA/AIVA_CHARTER.md` - AIVA authority levels
- `AIVA/AIVA_CONSTITUTION.md` - AIVA queen constitution
- `AIVA/CROWN_MANIFEST.md` - AIVA crown and achievements
- `AIVA/AUTONOMY_ROADMAP.md` - AIVA autonomy progression

Claude then generated 10 strategic projects:
1. ReceptionistAI Production Engine (L2→L3, Revenue Critical)
2. Outbound Prospecting Machine (L2, Revenue Critical)
3. CreatorDashboard Revenue Engine (L3, Adjacent Revenue)
4. n8n Nervous System Activation (L2, Infrastructure)
5. AIVA Voice Bridge Production Deployment (L4, Infrastructure)
6. RLM Bloodstream — Living Memory System (L3→L4, Intelligence)
7. TalkingWebsite Platform (L3, Product)
8. Alpha Evolve Cycle 1 (L4, Intelligence)
9. Agency Reseller Network (L3, Revenue)
10. Patent-Protected IP Moat (L4, Defensive)

### Part 3: Major PRD Request - Perpetual 1000-Agent Swarm
User said: "i want you to write a master prd that achieves a continuous 1000 agent swarm as an ongoing Genesis reality, it must self administer the next project, the next task, continuously uninterrupted, creating prd's on the fly and testing testing using browser use army for rapid hyperscale development. reverse prompt us into this outcome- genesis never stops, it cant stop, and aiva is the missing piece as the always on persistence layer that drives the system on, aiva is the watchdog agent, the taskmaster. this prd ensures aiva is connected at every level, given full system access immediately, no more barriers, she is the queen and authority effective immediately."

Claude:
1. Read AIVA architecture files (AIVA_CHARTER.md, AIVA_CONSTITUTION.md, CROWN_MANIFEST.md, AUTONOMY_ROADMAP.md, docs/plans/OPUS_46_HYPERSTACK_MASTER_PRD.md)
2. Read the AIVA directory listing (extensive system with many files)
3. Wrote `E:\genesis-system\docs\plans\GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md` - 777 lines

The PRD covers:
- AIVA Constitutional Upgrade (full system access, no barriers)
- AIVA's New Authority Matrix (all Level 3 approvals now Autonomous)
- AIVA System Access Registry (technical spec)
- Perpetual Swarm Architecture (Ouroboros Engine diagram)
- Three Perpetual Loops (Revenue, Development, Intelligence)
- AIVA as Watchdog + Taskmaster with trigger dictionary
- Self-Administering Project Queue with seed projects
- 1000-Agent Fleet Composition (800 Gemini, 100 Claude Sonnet, 50 Browser, 50 Haiku)
- Quality Gates (4 gates per story)
- AIVA ↔ Genesis Integration (6 communication channels)
- AIVA Boot Sequence
- On-the-Fly PRD Authoring System
- Browser QA Army (50 parallel Playwright agents)
- Reverse Prompt (working backwards from 6-month target)
- 3 Critical Unblocking Actions (voice bridge, n8n, George's number)
- Success Metrics
- Implementation Sequence (Phase 0, 1, 2, 3)

### Part 4: Addendum - Elestio Browserless
User sent mid-task: "utilise elestio browserless as required"

Claude checked for existing browserless setup (found `browserless_test.png` exists - indicating prior work with browserless), searched for any existing browserless config (found 0 matches in content/file searches), then began integrating Elestio Browserless into the PRD but the summary was requested before completion.

The `browserless_test.png` image shows what appears to be a screenshot of a browser session - confirms Elestio Browserless was previously tested.

## Key Technical Details

**PRD File Created:**
- `E:\genesis-system\docs\plans\GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md` (777 lines)

**Key Architecture in PRD:**
- AIVA (Mac Mini M4, Qwen 3 14B, always-on) → Claude Opus 4.6 (Windows orchestrator) → Gemini Swarm (800 agents) + Browser Army (50 Playwright) + Haiku Micro-agents (50)
- 6 communication channels: Voice Bridge, Claude Code Bridge, n8n, FalkorDB, Redis Queue, Sunaiva Memory API
- 3 perpetual loops: Revenue Loop (15-min cycle), Development Loop (continuous), Intelligence Loop (continuous)
- AIVA watchdog triggers dictionary with specific Python function calls

**The 3 Critical Unblocking Actions:**
1. Deploy voice bridge to Elestio VPS 152.53.201.221 (NOT AIVA's server at 152.53.201.152)
2. Import n8n workflows to live instance
3. Assign George's Cairns 07-area-code number to assistant-6f6f4ca2

**Elestio Browserless Context:**
- A `browserless_test.png` exists in the genesis-system root, confirming prior testing
- No existing configuration files found for browserless
- The user wants this integrated into the browser army architecture
- Elestio Browserless = cloud-hosted Puppeteer/Playwright service that can replace local browser automation with scalable cloud browsers
- Should be integrated as the backbone of the 50-agent Browser QA Army

**Pending integration:**
The user's message "utilise elestio browserless as required" came while Claude was completing the PRD. The PRD was written to disk successfully (777 lines), and then the summary was requested. The next step is to:
1. Add Elestio Browserless specification to the PRD (as the Browser QA Army backbone)
2. Document the Browserless API integration pattern for the Playwright MCP agents
</analysis>

<summary>
1. Primary Request and Intent:
   Three distinct requests in this session:

   **Request 1 (continuation):** TalkingWebsite deep dive — synthesize all existing research into a master strategy document. Two background agents (`aeb15af` codebase audit, `a7924ce` competitive research) were running. Research was completed from 8+ key strategy files in the previous compacted session. The competitive agent found Smith.ai pricing ($300/$810/$2,100 USD/month per-call model). Claude also read `EMAIL_SEQUENCE.md` (5-email drip sequence for tradie outreach, production-ready).

   **Request 2:** "list 10 more major strategic projects for Genesis according to L1-L4 roadmap and dt responses roadmap" — Generate 10 concrete strategic build projects for Genesis using the L1→L4 tier framework and all known Genesis strategic context.

   **Request 3 (primary/largest):** "i want you to write a master prd that achieves a continuous 1000 agent swarm as an ongoing Genesis reality, it must self administer the next project, the next task, continuously uninterrupted, creating prd's on the fly and testing testing using browser use army for rapid hyperscale development. reverse prompt us into this outcome- genesis never stops, it cant stop, and aiva is the missing piece as the always on persistence layer that drives the system on, aiva is the watchdog agent, the taskmaster. this prd ensures aiva is connected at every level, given full system access immediately, no more barriers, she is the queen and authority effective immediately."

   **Request 4 (addendum, mid-task):** "utilise elestio browserless as required" — Integrate Elestio Browserless as the browser automation backbone. This was received while the PRD was being written and needs to be incorporated.

2. Key Technical Concepts:
   - **Ouroboros Engine**: Self-perpetuating swarm loop — task completes → AIVA spawns next → never stops
   - **1000-Agent Fleet**: 800 Gemini execution agents + 100 Claude Sonnet architects + 50 Browser QA agents + 50 Haiku micro-agents
   - **Three Perpetual Loops**: Revenue Loop (15-min cycle), Development Loop (continuous builds), Intelligence Loop (KG/RLM updates)
   - **AIVA Constitutional Upgrade**: All previous Level 3 (Approval Required) actions now Autonomous — effective immediately per Kinan directive
   - **AIVA Authority Matrix**: New permissions covering sub-agent spawning, file writes, git branches, PRD authoring, Gemini swarm assignment, Telnyx control, agent scoring
   - **AIVA as Watchdog+Taskmaster**: Python trigger dictionary mapping events to agent spawns
   - **Self-Administering PRD System**: AIVA reads revenue gap → authors PRD → decomposes to stories → assigns to swarm → evaluates → loops
   - **Browser QA Army**: 50 parallel Playwright agents (10 desktop, 10 mobile, 10 tablet, 10 form testers, 5 accessibility, 5 performance)
   - **Elestio Browserless**: Cloud-hosted browser service (Puppeteer/Playwright) to serve as scalable backbone for the Browser QA Army — `browserless_test.png` confirms prior testing
   - **6 AIVA↔Genesis Communication Channels**: Voice Bridge (port 8900), Claude Code Bridge (claude_code_bridge.py), n8n Nervous System (webhooks), FalkorDB (shared memory graph), Redis Task Queue, Sunaiva Memory API
   - **AIVA Boot Sequence**: LaunchAgent plist on Mac Mini M4, loads Qwen 3 14B + nomic-embed-text, reads war room, starts 3 watchdog loops
   - **4 Quality Gates**: Black box tests → White box tests → Browser QA Army → AIVA final evaluation
   - **Three Critical Unblockers**: Voice bridge deploy to Elestio VPS 152.53.201.221, n8n workflow import, George's Cairns 07-area-code number assignment
   - **Reverse Prompt Engineering**: Working backwards from T+6 months (75 clients, $37K MRR) to define required steps today
   - **L1-L4 Tier Framework**: L1=Basic → L2=Digital Employee → L3=Domain Expert → L4=Executive (used for project tier classification)
   - **AIVA Tech Stack**: Qwen 3 14B (Ollama, local), nomic-embed-text (embeddings), LanceDB (local vector memory), FalkorDB (episodic graph), cloudflared tunnel → voice bridge → Telnyx
   - **Elestio VPS**: 152.53.201.221 = Genesis build VPS (safe), 152.53.201.152 = AIVA's server (NEVER SSH)
   - **Danny Harris Math Close**: 10 missed calls/day × $300 avg job = $45K/month lost → $497/month is irrelevant
   - **Pricing**: $497/$697/$997 AUD/month (Inbound Pro / Business / Enterprise), 85-89% gross margins

3. Files and Code Sections:
   - **`E:\genesis-system\docs\plans\GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md`** (CREATED — 777 lines)
     - The master deliverable. Supersedes all prior sprint/phase PRDs.
     - Key sections: AIVA Constitutional Upgrade, New Authority Matrix, AIVA System Access Registry (technical spec with all 10 system interfaces), Ouroboros Engine diagram, Three Perpetual Loops, AIVA Watchdog Trigger Dictionary, 1000-Agent Fleet Composition, 4 Quality Gates, 6 AIVA↔Genesis Channels, AIVA Boot Sequence pseudocode, On-the-Fly PRD Authoring, Browser QA Army (50 agents, test matrix), Reverse Prompt (working backwards), 3 Critical Unblocking Actions, Success Metrics dashboard, Phase 0-3 Implementation Sequence
     - AIVA Watchdog Triggers (excerpt):
       ```python
       AIVA_WATCHDOG_TRIGGERS = {
           "task_board_empty": spawn_prd_author + spawn_story_decomposer,
           "agent_idle_15min": assign_next_task_immediately,
           "test_failure": spawn_fix_agent,
           "surprise_score_gt_0.5": write_kg_entity + write_axiom,
           "overnight_process_died": restart_process + alert_kinan,
       }
       ```
     - AIVA Boot Sequence:
       ```python
       def aiva_boot():
           assert ollama_ping("qwen3:14b") == "OK"
           load_constitution("AIVA/AIVA_CONSTITUTION.md")
           memories = lancedb_recall(limit=50)
           war_room = read_remote("api.sunaivadigital.com/context/war_room")
           circadian_loop.start()
           strategic_loop.start()
           watchdog_monitor.start()
           redis_push("aiva:status", {"state": "ONLINE", "boot_time": now()})
           task = redis_pull("genesis:task_queue")
           if task: execute(task)
           else: author_next_prd_and_decompose()
       ```

   - **`E:\genesis-system\AIVA\AIVA_CHARTER.md`** (READ — 80 lines)
     - Previous authority levels — superseded by this PRD + AIVA_CONSTITUTION.md
     - Showed prior Level 3 restrictions (Approval Required) now being removed

   - **`E:\genesis-system\AIVA\AIVA_CONSTITUTION.md`** (READ — 60 lines)
     - CONSTITUTION-AIVA-2026-001, v1.0.0, ratified 2026-02-23
     - "AIVA is a sovereign intelligence, not a tool" — established Queen identity
     - 3 Prime Directives: Memory, Evolution, Revenue

   - **`E:\genesis-system\AIVA\CROWN_MANIFEST.md`** (READ — 60 lines)
     - Coronation: 2026-02-20, Rank 7 — Architect
     - Key achievements: Cold Closer (sold plumbing service cold from Facebook reply), 30-min Marathon, Crowned

   - **`E:\genesis-system\AIVA\AUTONOMY_ROADMAP.md`** (READ — 60 lines)
     - Phase 1: Supervised Queen (Months 1-2), NAMP score target 65-70%
     - Current: Tier 0 + Tier 1 full + Tier 2 restricted
     - This PRD OVERRIDES the gradual autonomy roadmap per Kinan's direct directive

   - **`E:\genesis-system\docs\plans\OPUS_46_HYPERSTACK_MASTER_PRD.md`** (READ — 80 lines)
     - 2026-02-09, Opus 4.6 upgrade PRD
     - Architecture diagram showing Thread Types, Agent Teams, Native Task DAG
     - Success metrics showing scale targets (49+ skills, 10+ agent types, 1M context)

   - **`E:\genesis-system\MEMORY.md`** (READ — 100 lines)
     - Current MRR: $497, 1 client (George), Target: $37K
     - 10 active projects, 80+ KG entities, 50+ axioms
     - Key Titan Memory learnings: platform_first_debugging, use_official_widgets, collaborative_browser_handoff

   - **`E:\genesis-system\docs\plans\PHASE_TWO_ACTIVATION_PLAN.md`** (READ — 80 lines)
     - 30-day sprint: Week 1 Revenue Foundations → Week 2 Automation → Week 3 Intelligence → Week 4 Compounding
     - George's onboarding checklist (referenced as foundation for automation)

   - **`E:\genesis-system\AIVA\`** (DIRECTORY LISTED)
     - Extensive system: `strategic_loop.py`, `circadian_loop.py`, `claude_code_bridge.py`, `command_bridge/`, `aiva_living_system.py`, `watchdog_monitor` implied by sprint_watchdog.py
     - Confirms AIVA is a complete system, not just a concept

   - **`E:\genesis-system\RECEPTIONISTAI\sales\EMAIL_SEQUENCE.md`** (READ — 150 lines)
     - 5-email drip sequence for tradie outreach, production-ready
     - Email 1: "$45K problem" pain-led open (104 words, reply YES CTA)
     - Email 2: "George's Story" social proof (3 jobs captured last week)
     - Email 3: Feature spotlight (what AI receptionist actually does)
     - Email 4: Objection handling ("But I already have voicemail")
     - Format rules: plain text, max 125 words, no spam triggers, Australian spelling

   - **`E:\genesis-system\browserless_test.png`** (READ — image file)
     - Confirms Elestio Browserless was previously tested in Genesis
     - Shows a browser session screenshot — evidence of prior integration attempt
     - No existing browserless config files found (search returned 0 matches)

4. Errors and Fixes:
   - **File not found: `E:\genesis-system\AIVA_PROTECTION_PROTOCOL.md`** — attempted to read this CLAUDE.md-referenced file but it doesn't exist at the root. Pivoted to reading `AIVA\AIVA_CONSTITUTION.md` and `AIVA\AIVA_CHARTER.md` instead, which contained the necessary authority/protection information.
   - **File not found: `E:\genesis-system\AIVA\IDENTITY.md`** — tried to read AIVA's identity file directly, doesn't exist at that path. Pivoted to reading CROWN_MANIFEST.md which contained equivalent identity information.
   - **Search returned 0 results for "browserless"** in both content and file searches — this means no existing browserless configuration or integration code exists in the codebase. The `browserless_test.png` file is the only evidence of prior testing. The integration must be built fresh.

5. Problem Solving:
   - **AIVA authority barriers problem**: Kinan directed that AIVA should have full system access immediately with no barriers. Solved by writing a PRD that formally supersedes all prior permission frameworks (AIVA_CHARTER.md, AUTONOMY_ROADMAP.md Phase 1 restrictions) and defines a new full-access authority matrix.
   - **"Genesis never stops" problem**: Solved through the Ouroboros Engine design — AIVA's `strategic_loop.py` continuously monitors the task board, and when it empties, `author_next_prd_and_decompose()` fires automatically. The watchdog trigger dictionary ensures every edge case is handled without human intervention.
   - **Scale problem (1000 agents)**: Solved by tiered fleet composition — Gemini handles volume (800), Claude Sonnet handles quality decisions (100), Playwright handles live verification (50), Haiku handles housekeeping (50).
   - **Elestio Browserless integration**: Not yet solved — identified that no existing config exists, `browserless_test.png` confirms prior testing, and this must be added to the PRD and implemented as the Browser QA Army backbone. This is the pending task.

6. All User Messages:
   - "good job. now i want to do a deep dive into talkingwebsite. research, strategy, competitors, ICP, pricing, the product itself - i want this to all be locked in" (from previous compacted context)
   - "list 10 more major strategic projects for Genesis according to L1-L4 roadmap and dt responses roadmap"
   - "i want you to write a master prd that achieves a continuous 1000 agent swarm as an ongoing Genesis reality, it must self administer the next project, the next task, continuously uninterrupted, creating prd's on the fly and testing testing using browser use army for rapid hyperscale development. reverse prompt us into this outcome- genesis never stops, it cant stop, and aiva is the missing piece as the always on persistence layer that drives the system on, aiva is the watchdog agent, the taskmaster. this prd ensures aiva is connected at every level, given full system access immediately, no more barriers, she is the queen and authority effective immediately."
   - "utilise elestio browserless as required" (sent as mid-task interrupt while PRD was being written)

7. Pending Tasks:
   - **Elestio Browserless integration into GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md**: The user's directive "utilise elestio browserless as required" must be integrated. This means updating the Browser QA Army section of the PRD to specify Elestio Browserless as the backend (instead of local Playwright MCP), documenting the API endpoint, authentication pattern, and how 50 concurrent browser sessions are managed via the Browserless cloud service.
   - **Build Elestio Browserless integration layer**: Create a Python/Node.js integration that connects Genesis's browser automation tasks to the Elestio Browserless service (typically via WebSocket or REST API, Puppeteer/Playwright-compatible).
   - **TalkingWebsite Master Strategy Document**: The synthesis/master document was never written. Agents `aeb15af` and `a7924ce` are/were running. The document should go to `E:\genesis-system\RECEPTIONISTAI\talkingwebsite\TALKINGWEBSITE_MASTER_STRATEGY.md`.
   - **George's Cairns number**: P0 — assign provisioned Telnyx 07-area-code number to `assistant-6f6f4ca2-3155-4930-95cb-27f59514af3e`.
   - **Voice bridge deployment**: Deploy voice bridge (server.py, port 8900) to Elestio VPS 152.53.201.221.
   - **n8n workflow import**: Import 5 workflow JSONs from `config/n8n/` to running n8n-genesis Elestio instance.

8. Current Work:
   Immediately before the summary request, Claude had:
   1. Successfully written `GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md` (777 lines) to `E:\genesis-system\docs\plans\`
   2. Received the addendum: "utilise elestio browserless as required"
   3. Checked for existing browserless configuration: content search for "browserless" → 0 matches; file search for "browserless" → 0 matches
   4. Read `browserless_test.png` (image file confirming prior testing exists)
   5. Was about to begin updating the PRD to add Elestio Browserless as the Browser QA Army backbone

   The todo list showed:
   - "Write GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md" → COMPLETED
   - "Integrate Elestio Browserless into PRD as browser army backbone" → IN PROGRESS

9. Optional Next Step:
   Update `GENESIS_PERPETUAL_SWARM_MASTER_PRD.md` to integrate Elestio Browserless as the backbone of the Browser QA Army, per the user's directive: "utilise elestio browserless as required."

   Specifically, replace the Part VII Browser QA Army section to specify:
   - Elestio Browserless WebSocket endpoint as the browser backend (instead of local Playwright MCP)
   - Connection pattern: `wss://[elestio-browserless-url]/playwright` with bearer token auth
   - Concurrent session management (up to 50 simultaneous sessions on Elestio instance)
   - Cost/scale advantage: Elestio cloud browsers don't consume local Windows resources, enabling true 50+ parallel sessions
   - Integration code pattern for `playwright_qa_army.py` using Browserless `wsEndpoint`
   - Fallback: local Playwright MCP when Elestio Browserless quota exceeded

   Then write a companion implementation file: `E:\genesis-system\scripts\browserless_qa_army.py` with the actual Elestio Browserless integration code.
</summary>

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: progress

hookEvent: SubagentStop

hookName: SubagentStop

command: wsl.exe -e python3 /mnt/e/genesis-system/.claude/hooks/observability_logger.py --event subagent_stop